首页> 外文OA文献 >Application of a Repeat-Measure Biomarker Measurement Error Model to 2 Validation Studies: Examination of the Effect of Within-Person Variation in Biomarker Measurements
【2h】

Application of a Repeat-Measure Biomarker Measurement Error Model to 2 Validation Studies: Examination of the Effect of Within-Person Variation in Biomarker Measurements

机译:重复测量生物标志物测量误差模型在2项验证研究中的应用:检验内部变异对生物标志物测量的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Repeat-biomarker measurement error models accounting for systematic correlated within-person error can be used to estimate the correlation coefficient (ρ) and deattenuation factor (λ), used in measurement error correction. These models account for correlated errors in the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and the 24-hour diet recall and random within-person variation in the biomarkers. Failure to account for within-person variation in biomarkers can exaggerate correlated errors between FFQs and 24-hour diet recalls. For 2 validation studies, ρ and λ were calculated for total energy and protein density. In the Automated Multiple-Pass Method Validation Study (n = 471), doubly labeled water (DLW) and urinary nitrogen (UN) were measured twice in 52 adults approximately 16 months apart (2002–2003), yielding intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.43 for energy (DLW) and 0.54 for protein density (UN/DLW). The deattenuated correlation coefficient for protein density was 0.51 for correlation between the FFQ and the 24-hour diet recall and 0.49 for correlation between the FFQ and the biomarker. Use of repeat-biomarker measurement error models resulted in a ρ of 0.42. These models were similarly applied to the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition Study (1999–2000). In conclusion, within-person variation in biomarkers can be substantial, and to adequately assess the impact of correlated subject-specific error, this variation should be assessed in validation studies of FFQs.
机译:考虑到系统内相关的人员内部误差的重复生物标记物测量误差模型可用于估计在测量误差校正中使用的相关系数(ρ)和衰减因子(λ)。这些模型说明了食物频率调查表(FFQ)和24小时饮食回想以及生物标志物在人内随机变化中的相关误差。无法说明人体内生物标志物的变异会夸大FFQ与24小时饮食回收之间的相关误差。对于2个验证研究,计算了总能量和蛋白质密度的ρ和λ。在自动多次通过方法验证研究(n = 471)中,在相距16个月(2002-2003年)的52位成年人中两次测量了双标记水(DLW)和尿液氮(UN),得出的组内相关系数为0.43。能量(DLW),蛋白质密度(UN / DLW)为0.54。 FFQ和24小时饮食召回之间的相关性的蛋白质密度的衰减相关系数为0.51,FFQ和生物标记之间的相关性为0.49。重复生物标记物测量误差模型的使用导致ρ为0.42。这些模型类似地应用于观察蛋白和能量营养研究(1999–2000)。总之,生物标志物的人内差异可能很大,并且为了充分评估相关受试者特异性错误的影响,应在FFQ的验证研究中评估这种差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号